The Time series Forecasting Benchmark (TFB) has emerged as a critical tool for advancing time series forecasting (TSF) methods. Its rigorous evaluation framework addresses the limitations of previous benchmarks, offering a diverse and realistic collection of datasets for empirical analysis. The TFB’s introduction is poised to catalyze innovation and enhance fair comparisons among TSF methodologies, similar to the transformative role of benchmarks in other scientific fields. Research into time series forecasting has historically depended on a variety of methods and datasets, but has often been limited by a lack of standardized benchmarks that can provide fair and comprehensive evaluations of different approaches. Challenges such as dataset bias and limited coverage have been significant obstacles to progress. The need for a robust benchmarking system that could address these issues has been clear, paving the way for the development of TFB. The TFB stands out due to its extensive coverage across statistical, , and deep learning methods, complemented by a variety of evaluation strategies. It introduces a highly scalable and flexible pipeline that standardizes the datasets and evaluation protocol, ensuring fair comparisons and bias elimination. This enhances the accuracy of performance assessments and provides an even playing field for all TSF methodologies. Experimentation with TFB has revealed critical insights into the relative performance of various TSF methods. Notably, it has demonstrated the comparative strengths of statistical methods and Transformer-based approaches, particularly regarding datasets with complex seasonal and nonlinear patterns. TFB’s emphasis on multivariate time series has highlighted the importance of considering inter-channel dependencies, an aspect crucial for accurate forecasting in real-world scenarios. The implications of TFB’s findings are significant for the advancement of time series forecasting. It underscores the need for comprehensive evaluations that take into account the complexity and diversity of real-world data. By providing such a robust benchmark, TFB is expected to drive future TSF research and method development, offering a clearer understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of various forecasting approaches. In a recent publication in the Journal of Machine Learning Research, a study titled “Benchmarking Time Series Analysis and Forecasting Models,” researchers emphasized the importance of benchmarks in evaluating TSF methods. This study correlates with TFB’s objectives, further validating the need for a comprehensive and equitable benchmark like TFB in the time series forecasting domain. Helpful points to consider include: TFB’s introduction marks a significant milestone in TSF research, introducing a benchmark that mirrors the pivotal role of ImageNet in the computer vision arena. By promoting fairness, diversity, and extensive method coverage, TFB sets a new standard for evaluating forecasting methods. As TSF continues to grow in importance across various domains, TFB’s comprehensive and standardized evaluation platform will be instrumental in driving innovation and enabling robust comparisons among methodologies. This advancement promises to enhance the precision and generalizability of TSF models, ultimately benefiting a wide range of applications that rely on accurate forecasting.