January 29, 2020

How the Power and Privilege of Prince Andrew, President Trump, and Anne Sacoolas Have Beaten Justice—So Far
It says much about these through-the-looking-glass times that there is a “debate” about whether there should be witnesses at Donald Trump’s impeachment trial. Of course there should. This is a trial. Witnesses tend to feature in trials.On the same basis, Trump should be involved too, at the very least providing evidence and answering questions (as Bill Clinton did in grand jury testimony in 1998). None of this should be up for debate, or controversial, or dependent on any party representatives’ votes. The impeachment trial is maddening for any number of reasons, but mostly because it is very visibly not being conducted in the manner of any trial we would recognize. It is simply another familiar circus of D.C. grandstanding and grizzling.This is what having power, money, and influence really means, beyond the big houses, servants, cosseted protection, and gilded grandeur of it all. Apparently, it also protects you from having to answer the kinds of questions from those in authority that those without money and privilege are routinely expected to answer—as the varied but echoing examples of Prince Andrew, President Trump, and Anne Sacoolas show us. Prince Andrew Does Nothing to Help the Jeffrey Epstein Investigation. Meanwhile, the Royal Family Burns.From all three, we can deduce that money or different kinds of power put you above the mechanics of justice. It means you may not get a uniformed knock at the door. You may not be questioned. You may not be arrested. You may not be hand-cuffed. There may be no perp walk. You may resist arrest and avoid answering an official inquiry—because, quite simply, nobody can get near you to arrest you or ask you anything.Past buying you the best defense, money, power or both can insulate you from having any contact with the pesky law at all, even when there are profound questions over your own conduct and behavior, and knowledge of—and alleged participation—in particular events. Money and power mean you can choose the terms of how authorities interact with you. You can, in effect, loftily ignore the law.Prince Andrew, U.S. authorities have said, has not responded to any requests to answer questions about his alleged sexual encounter with Virginia Roberts Giuffre, and his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. (Prince Andrew denied this Tuesday night.) The prince has offered “zero co-operation,” U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman said Monday—this after Andrew had told BBC’s Newsnight that he was “willing to help any appropriate law enforcement agency.” He also said he would consider giving evidence under oath “if push came to shove and the legal advice was to do so.”Well, if one believes American prosecutors, for the last two months, from Andrew and Buckingham Palace, there has been the ultimate rich person’s power play: silence. It is a silence that speaks volumes of Andrew’s arrogance and disinterested detachment—visible in that appearance of his on BBC Newsnight interview last year—from the experiences of those whom Epstein allegedly abused.Even if his legal team has recommended Andrew keep shtum (given that when he did answer the BBC’s questions, it was an unmitigated disaster), what of his own stated commitment to help the authorities? What about the moral imperative of helping authorities investigate Epstein’s activities?President Trump is tweeting prodigiously, and giving off-the-cuff quotes at press conferences, but he is not—yet anyway—answering any questions at his impeachment trial. However you feel about this trial—and whatever your views about Trump—there is the central bemusing fact that an impeachment trial is taking place, where the person at the center of it and the witnesses to his alleged behavior, aided by their prime political supporters, somehow have used their power to keep him from being held to the most basic of accounts. (That may change if Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell loses a few members' votes, as he warned he might in a private caucus conference Tuesday. Or, of course, when Trump is no longer president.)What is the point of a “trial” where certain evidence, including the testimony of the accused and witnesses, is not aired, and open to cross-examination? This trial, so far, is an absurdist mockery of justice. Republicans should not be able to vote on whether witnesses should be called. This shouldn’t be party-political. Witnesses, and the accused, should simply be duty-bound to answer questions as in any trial. How can we judge the burden of proof without the full breadth of evidence?With so much lacking, we should not call this a trial. This is the very opposite of checks and balances. It is a flagrant abuse of power, and an offensive waste of time, on our dime.Then there is Anne Sacoolas, the wife of a U.S. diplomat charged with causing the death of 19-year-old Harry Dunn through reckless driving in Britain last summer. U.K. Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab is said to be “incandescent with rage” that Sacoolas is not being extradited to Britain on the disputed grounds of diplomatic immunity. Raab will meet U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Wednesday and we will see if this “rage” actually translates to action—and whether the person who allegedly caused Dunn’s death will ever face any questioning or undergo the judicial process in Britain about the incident.In all three cases, the basic workings of law and due process have failed when set against the power and privilege of Andrew, Trump, and Sacoolas. They have made themselves fundamentally unavailable to the relevant authorities.If they were ordinary people, you or me, presumably the investigating authority would not accept us simply declining their presence. They would not accept our, “You know what, guys? Not today. I’m not in the mood.” We would be asked questions, and any resistance and failure to address these questions would have consequences.Why do President Trump, the witnesses to President Trump’s alleged behavior, Prince Andrew, and Anne Sacoolas not give themselves over to the people who want to ask them things—with every legal representation available to them that they choose to have?There are very individual answers to this known only to each of them, but one linking factor may be fear—fear of what being questioned, or telling the truth, or being forced to tell the truth, will mean for their personal freedom, their standing, their status, and the effects of the process on the families and institutions they are a part of. Well, sure. But diddums, powerful people. Regular humans do not have this luxury. Regular humans have to face the music. It is why ordinary people try, by and large, to avoid doing illegal or bad things. It is why, perhaps, that the very rich and powerful feel free to behave egregiously. They know how the system will inevitably benefit them, even when the law or authorities seek their arraignment or engagement. “Executive privilege,” “diplomatic immunity”: such phrases have meaning but can also become convenient muffling cloths, a rich person’s make-nice, a regal wave of the hand in legal-ese to keep the annoying questions of the hoi-polloi, the authorities (sniff) away. They—the endless legal teams and assistants and advisers and gatekeepers; all paid-up obstructionists to justice—keep the rich cushioned as they evade, stay silent, and maybe worse. It means that the letter of the law—that we all must live with and live under—is perceived by the powerful as just another annoying trifle that they needn’t concern themselves with.They are not simply buying themselves out of trouble with fancy lawyers; they are presently able to resist the process of justice itself. The law, and where investigators can reach and what and who they can access, must change to make the powerful as answerable as the rest of us. When questionable justice, lacking justice—if not outright injustice—occurs in plain sight, where does that leave our own relationship to the law and due process? To be clear: Prince Andrew should talk to the Feds, Donald Trump and witnesses should give evidence to the impeachment inquiry, and Anne Sacoolas should face the correct legal process. These should be givens. There should be no debate. They are the right things, legally and morally, to do. All three people can argue their cases or points of view robustly, but they should not have the freedom to actively avoid participation in the cases themselves. If it is true, as has often been invoked on television in recent days, that “no one is above the law,” then let us see that. Or it is time to be honest that certain people are indeed above the law, and then insert some very depressing asterisks and opt-out clauses in our most fundamental laws.
Related Stories
Latest News
Top news around the world
Israel at War

Israel has entered its fourth week of war against Hamas after the group infiltrated the country on October 7.

Israel conducted its most intense ground operation in Gaza overnight, attacking about 150 underground targets, according to IDF.

Around the World

Celebrity News

> Latest News in Media

Media
Star Wars Director Says It's About Time A Woman Makes A Star Wars Movie
Jan 02, 2024
Oscar-winning documentary filmmaker Sharmeed Obaid-Chinoy is directing an upcoming Star Wars movie that brings back Daisy Ridley in the role of Rey. Obaid-Chinoy will become the first woman to direct a Star Wars film, dating back to the franchise's origins in the 1970s. Speaking about this, Obaid-Chinoy told CNN that she is "very thrilled" to make the movie and create something that is "very special.""We're in 2024 now, and I think it's about time we had a woman come forward to shape the story in a galaxy far, far away," she said.Obaid-Chinoy won Best Documentary, Short Subjects Academy Awards for Saving Face (2012) and A Girl in the River: The Price of Forgiveness (2015).In 2020, Lucasfilm boss Kathleen Kennedy told the BBC that a woman would eventually direct a Star Wars movie, saying that would "absolutely" happen, "without question." Victoria Mahoney was a second unit director on The Rise of Skywalker, but a woman has never claimed a top directing credit on a Star Wars movie.On the TV side of things, The Mandalorian has featured a number of female directors, including Deborah Chow and Bryce Dallas Howard. Chow went on to direct the Obi-Wan TV series, too.Another high-profile franchise that has never had a female director is James Bond. Producer Barbara Broccoli and Skyfall director Sam Mendes have both said they want to see a woman direct a future 007 film.As for Obaid-Chinoy's Star Wars movie, little is known about it apart from the fact that Ridley will come back to play Rey. It is expected that this film will be the first of the three new Star Wars films to come to theaters, possibly releasing in December 2025.According to a report, Peaky Blinders creator Steven Knight is writing the Rey movie, taking over for Damon Lindelof and Justin Britt-Gibson.
READ MORE
Watch It
Timothée Chalamet Addresses Date Night With Kylie Jenner at Beyoncé’s Concert | E! News
December 20, 2023
B3z63vdSZ6Q
How Cher REALLY Feels About Kelly Clarkson’s Cover of Her Song | E! News
December 20, 2023
kf7fwJHnaxU
Ryan Gosling Drops NEW Holiday Version of ‘I’m Just Ken' | E! News
December 20, 2023
FsBATnrFv6w
The Top 10 TV Shows of All Time | Variety
December 20, 2023
mwZnVmsQNAs
Ava DuVernay & Michael Mann l Directors on Directors
December 19, 2023
qBRTngfdqZ8
Ari Aster & Yorgos Lanthimos l Directors on Directors
December 18, 2023
BXYD3UISwCs
2023's Top TMZ Sports Interviews: Shaq, Gronk, Tyson, Derulo & More! | TMZ Sports Full Ep - 12/25/23
December 20, 2023
LuSEtAJ1Dms
Aaron Rodgers' Season Over and Lakers' Unique Banner Celebration! | TMZ Sports Full Ep - 12/19/23
December 20, 2023
_SZM5laBY1I
#SelenaGomez is standing by her man, #BennyBlanco, amid backlash from fans over their relationship
December 20, 2023
3OAOi6VvLnQ
Inside Brad Pitt’s whirlwind 60th birthday weekend with Ines de Ramon: Romantic Paris to festive LA
December 20, 2023
o9clvkwWVPI
Inside Brad Pitt’s whirlwind 60th birthday weekend with Ines de Ramon: Romantic Paris to festive LA
December 20, 2023
inNYH5LILUM
When Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce would likely get engaged, according to NFL WAG Hannah Ann Sluss
December 20, 2023
kFWOyZlTJFc
TV Schedule
Late Night Show
Watch the latest shows of U.S. top comedians

Sports

Latest sport results, news, videos, interviews and comments
NBA Names Clare Akamanzi CEO Of NBA Africa
Jan 02, 2024 15:29
The NBA named Clare Akamanzi – an accomplished business executive and international trade and investment lawyer – as CEO of NBA Africa. Akamanzi will start her position on Jan. 23, 2024, and report to NBA Deputy Commissioner and Chief Operating Officer Mark Tatum. In this role, Akamanzi will oversee the NBA’s business and basketball development efforts in Africa and will be responsible for continuing to grow the popularity of basketball, the NBA and the Basketball Africa League (BAL) across the continent, including through grassroots basketball development, media distribution, corporate partnerships, and social responsibility initiatives that improve the livelihoods of African youth and families. For the last six and a half years, Akamanzi was CEO of Rwanda Development Board (RDB), where she spearheaded Rwanda’s economic development by enabling private sector growth. Under Akamanzi’s leadership, RDB implemented several business policy reforms and initiatives that led to significant investment and development for the country, including through partnerships with the BAL, Arsenal FC, Paris Saint-Germain FC, FC Bayern Munich and TIME Magazine, among others. “Clare’s business acumen, international experience and familiarity with basketball and the NBA make her the ideal executive to lead our business in Africa,” says Tatum. “NBA Africa and the Basketball Africa League are well-positioned for continued growth, and under Clare’s leadership we believe these initiatives will transform economies, communities and lives across the continent.” “I’ve seen firsthand how sports can positively impact businesses, families and communities in Africa, and the NBA and the BAL are a perfect example of that,” says Akamanzi. “The NBA has done an incredible job growing basketball and the economy around it across the continent, and I’m excited about the enormous opportunities ahead to build on that momentum.” Previously, Akamanzi was Chief Operating Officer of RDB and Head of Strategy and Policy Unit, Office of the President of the Republic of Rwanda. She has extensive international trade, business and diplomatic experience, having previously worked for the Rwandan Government at the World Trade Organization in Geneva, Switzerland and at the Rwandan Embassy in London, England. Akamanzi has worked or studied in seven different countries and holds an honorary LLD from Concordia University in Montreal, Canada, in recognition of her work in Rwanda. She earned a master’s degree in public administration from Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government in Cambridge, Massachusetts, where she was the recipient of three prestigious awards for academic excellence and distinguished contribution to the community: the Lucius N. Littauer Fellows Award, the Raymond & Josephine Vernon Award and the Robert Kennedy Public Service Award. In addition, Akamanzi holds a Master of Laws degree in international trade and investments from the University of Pretoria in South Africa, and a Bachelor of Laws degree from Makerere University in Kampala, Uganda. Akamanzi has served on several company boards, including the World Health Organization (WHO) Foundation, ECOBANK and Aviation, Travel and Logistics (ATL) company. She was recognized by Forbes as one of Africa’s Top 50 Powerful Women in 2020.
Latest Events
02
Jan
SPAIN: La Liga
Real Sociedad - Alaves
02
Jan
SPAIN: La Liga
Getafe - Rayo Vallecano
01
Jan
ENGLAND: Premier League
Liverpool - Newcastle United
01
Jan
ENGLAND: Championship
Blackburn - Rotherham
01
Jan
ENGLAND: Championship
QPR - Cardiff City
01
Jan
ENGLAND: Championship
Middlesbrough - Coventry
01
Jan
ENGLAND: Championship
Swansea City - West Bromwich Albion
01
Jan
ENGLAND: Championship
Stoke City - Ipswich Town
01
Jan
ENGLAND: Championship
Sheffield Wednesday - Hull City
01
Jan
ENGLAND: Championship
Norwich City - Southampton
01
Jan
ENGLAND: Championship
Leicester City - Huddersfield
01
Jan
ENGLAND: Championship
Bristol City - Millwall
01
Jan
ENGLAND: Championship
Plymouth - Watford
01
Jan
ENGLAND: Championship
Leeds - Birmingham
01
Jan
ENGLAND: Championship
Sunderland - Preston NE
31
Dec
ENGLAND: Premier League
Tottenham Hotspur - Bournemouth
31
Dec
ENGLAND: Premier League
Fulham - Arsenal
30
Dec
ITALY: Serie A
Juventus - Roma
30
Dec
ENGLAND: Premier League
Nottingham Forest - Manchester United
30
Dec
ENGLAND: Premier League
Luton - Chelsea
30
Dec
ENGLAND: Premier League
Manchester City - Sheffield United
30
Dec
ITALY: Serie A
AC Milan - Sassuolo
30
Dec
ENGLAND: Premier League
Crystal Palace - Brentford
30
Dec
ENGLAND: Premier League
Wolves - Everton
30
Dec
ITALY: Serie A
Verona - Salernitana
30
Dec
ENGLAND: Premier League
Aston Villa - Burnley
30
Dec
ITALY: Serie A
Atalanta - Lecce
30
Dec
ITALY: Serie A
Udinese - Bologna
30
Dec
ITALY: Serie A
Cagliari - Empoli
29
Dec
ITALY: Serie A
Genoa - Inter Milan
29
Dec
ITALY: Serie A
Napoli - Monza
28
Dec
ENGLAND: Premier League
Arsenal - West Ham United
28
Dec
ENGLAND: Premier League
Brighton - Tottenham Hotspur
27
Dec
ENGLAND: Premier League
Chelsea - Crystal Palace
27
Dec
ENGLAND: Premier League
Everton - Manchester City
26
Dec
ENGLAND: Premier League
Manchester United - Aston Villa
26
Dec
ENGLAND: Premier League
Burnley - Liverpool
24
Dec
ENGLAND: Premier League
Wolves - Chelsea
23
Dec
ENGLAND: Premier League
Liverpool - Arsenal
23
Dec
ITALY: Serie A
Roma - Napoli
23
Dec
ENGLAND: Premier League
Tottenham Hotspur - Everton
23
Dec
ENGLAND: Premier League
West Ham United - Manchester United
23
Dec
SPAIN: La Liga
Atletico Madrid - Sevilla
23
Dec
ITALY: Serie A
Inter Milan - Lecce
23
Dec
ITALY: Serie A
Frosinone - Juventus
22
Dec
ITALY: Serie A
Salernitana - AC Milan
21
Dec
SPAIN: La Liga
Alaves - Real Madrid
Find us on Instagram
at @feedimo to stay up to date with the latest.
Featured Video You Might Like
zWJ3MxW_HWA L1eLanNeZKg i1XRgbyUtOo -g9Qziqbif8 0vmRhiLHE2U JFCZUoa6MYE UfN5PCF5EUo 2PV55f3-UAg W3y9zuI_F64 -7qCxIccihU pQ9gcOoH9R8 g5MRDEXRk4k
Copyright © 2020 Feedimo. All Rights Reserved.