Nevertheless, not everyone feels this way. Many people have little to no knowledge of classic movies, since they never watch anything besides the latest releases. They usually don’t have anything against old movies. They just haven’t developed an appreciation for these great films. This is often because they’ve never really watched a classic movie, at least not the right one. I think anyone can become a classic film fan if he finds the right film. The purpose of the series “The Latest vs. the Greatest” is to encourage people to watch classic films by comparing them with recent releases that have similar themes or plots. Coming back to the
Oscars, seeing the list of nominees for the top awards made me realize that there were many major films last year which I didn’t cover in this series. For instance, one of the Best Picture nominees, “American Fiction,” has a unique and surprisingly rational premise. Thelonious “Monk” Ellison (Jeffrey Wright) is an intellectual black writer and professor in
Los Angeles whose novels have performed poorly because he they aren’t “black enough,” according to his publishers. After his university places him on temporary leave because he refuses to pander to students’ overly-sensitive racial notions, he writes a satirical novel called “My Pafology.” It’s a complete farce intended to mock the stereotypes expected of successful books by black writers, such as gangs, drugs, and coarse language. To his amazement, the publishers love it, and his agent (John Ortiz) convinces him to create a persona for the book’s author, convict on the run Stagg R. Leigh. The bitter joke gets out of hand as “Stagg” is being offered a huge movie deal, which he tries unsuccessfully to sabotage. As Monk ends up judging his own book at a literary award show, he gets a closer look at what drives other writers to pen the “blaxploitation” literature that thrives. Meanwhile, he is dealing with his mother’s (Leslie Uggams) increasing illness, strife with his siblings, and a blossoming romance with a lawyer, Coraline (Erika Alexander). “American Fiction” has gained high critical acclaim so far. It was nominated for five
Academy Awards, winning for Best Adapted Screenplay for Cord Jefferson; he won the same award at the BAFTAs. It’s surprising that this film has fared so well at the mainstream awards shows, considering its themes. As one IMDb reviewer aptly pointed out, it is being lauded by the very people whom it mocks for their patronizing pandering to racial stereotypes. Nevertheless, it is a very interesting and revealing premise which reminds me of a classic film, “Gentleman’s Agreement” from 1947. Philip Green (Gregory Peck) is a widowed journalist who moves to
New York City with his young son, Tommy (Dean Stockwell), and mother (Anne Revere). A magazine publisher, John Minify (Albert Dekker), assigns him to write an article on antisemitism in America. Philip doesn’t think that he is qualified to write the piece, as a Gentile, until he thinks of a fresh angle. He decides to present himself as a Jew for a while to experience the challenges and prejudice firsthand. Around the same time, he starts dating Kathy Lacy (Dorothy McGuire), Minify’s niece. Although she first suggested the topic for the article, she is shocked by Phil’s plan. Minify gives Phil an office at the magazine, but no one else knows that he is just pretending to be Jewish. When his Jewish secretary, Elaine Wales (June Havoc), commiserates with him about having to change her name to get a
Job with the company, he begins to realize just how deep-seated prejudice can be. The most surprising bigot he discovers is Kathy, who says she believes in equality for Jews but doesn’t want her
Friends to think she is engaged to one. Meanwhile, Phil’s Jewish childhood pal, Dave Goldman (John Garfield), comes to stay with the Greens after returning from World War II service, and Phil sees how shallow his experience will always be compared to Dave. These movies have some similar themes, since they both deal with the hot-topic prejudice of the day. The older film dealt with antisemitism as World War II, Nazism, and the
Holocaust had brought the issue of prejudice against Jews into open discussion, while the new movie addresses the stereotypes people expect from black authors and their literature. The protagonist of both movies is a scholarly writer who explores and confronts prejudice by posing as someone he isn’t. Of course, Phil is a Gentile who pretends to be Jewish, while Monk is actually a black man, but he pretends to be the sort of ghetto convict people would have expected to write a book like “My Pafology.” Both gentlemen have budding romances with
Women whom they meet during the film. Both relationships are soured when the author is disturbed by his sweetheart’s reaction to his literary project. Phil is disturbed to discover prejudice in Kathy’s viewpoint, and Monk is upset that Coraline likes his stereotypical book, which she doesn’t realize he wrote. Through his experiments, each man realizes that the topic of prejudice, stereotypes, and bias isn’t as cut and dry as he previously thought. In contrast, “Gentleman’s Agreement” deals with tough topics in a mature, intelligent way which is clean and wholesome enough for viewers of all ages to watch. That’s because it was made during Hollywood’s Golden Era of the Production Code Administration (PCA), 1934 to 1954, when Joseph I. Breen enforced the Motion Picture Production Code as head of the PCA. It forbade profanity, excessive violence, vulgarity, and graphic immorality. Nevertheless, the movies were entertaining and artistic without inappropriate content. What do you think about movies which deal with racial prejudice?