WASHINGTON -- President
Donald Trump publicly signaled his frustration Sunday with Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, the federal government's top infectious disease expert, after the doctor said more lives could have been saved from the coronavirus if the country had been shut down earlier.Trump reposted a
Twitter message that said "Time to FireFauci" as he rejected criticism of his slow initial response to the pandemic that has now killed more than 22,000 people in the United States. The president privately has been irritated at times with Fauci, but the Twitter post was the most explicit he has been in letting that show publicly.The message Trump retweeted came from a former
Republican congressional candidate. "Fauci is now saying that had Trump listened to the medical experts earlier he could've saved more lives," said the tweet by DeAnna Lorraine, who got less than 2% of the vote in an open primary against Speaker
Nancy Pelosi last month. "Fauci was telling people on February 29th that there was nothing to worry about and it posed no threat to the US at large. Time to Fire Fauci."In reposting the message, Trump added: "Sorry Fake News, it's all on tape. I banned
China long before people spoke up."The tweet came amid a flurry of messages blasted out by the president Sunday defending his handling of the coronavirus, which has come under sharp criticism, and pointing the finger instead at China, the World Health Organization, President
Barack Obama, the nation's governors,
Congress,
Democrats generally and the news media.Trump did not "ban China," but he did block foreign nationals who had been in China in the past 14 days from coming into the U.S. starting Feb. 2. Despite the policy, 40,000 Americans and other authorized travelers have still come into the country from China since then.Fauci and other public health experts were initially skeptical that the China travel restrictions would be useful when the president was first considering them, but then changed their minds and told Alex M. Azar II, the secretary of health and human services, on the morning of Jan. 30 that they supported them.Trump has repeatedly pointed back to those travel limits to defend his handling of the pandemic, but experts have said the limits were useful mainly to buy time that the administration did not then use to ramp up widespread testing and impose social distancing policies before infections could begin growing exponentially.By the third week of February, advisers had drafted a list of measures they believed would soon be necessary, like school closures, sports and concert cancellations and stay-at-home orders, but the president did not embrace them until mid-March.Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases since 1984, said Sunday that earlier imposition of such policies would have made a difference."I mean, obviously, you could logically say that if you had a process that was ongoing and you started mitigation earlier, you could have saved lives," he said on "State of the Union" on CNN. "Obviously, no one is going to deny that. But what goes into those kinds of decisions is complicated. But you're right. Obviously, if we had, right from the very beginning, shut everything down, it may have been a little bit different. But there was a lot of pushback about shutting things down."Fauci's comments, and the president's pushback, come at a critical time as Trump wrestles with how fast to begin reopening the country. Public health experts like Fauci have urged caution about resuming normal life too soon for fear of instigating another wave of illness and death, while the president's economic advisers and others are anxious to restart businesses at a time when more than 16 million Americans have been put out of work.Fauci and the president have publicly disagreed on several issues, including how long it will take to develop a vaccine and the president's aggressive promotion of the anti-malaria drug hydroxychloroquine, whose effects are unproven against the coronavirus. At a coronavirus task force briefing last week, Trump stopped Fauci from answering a question on the drug.Fauci has become a celebrated figure among much of the public, which trusts him far more than Trump, according to polls. A Quinnipiac University survey last week found that 78% of Americans approved of Fauci's handling of the crisis compared with 46% who approved of the president's response. That has prompted resentment among other government officials, some of whom have privately criticized Fauci for playing to the media and not always sending consistent messages.Trump spent much of Easter Sunday deflecting criticism and finding other targets. "If the Fake News Opposition Party is pushing, with all their might, the fact that
President Trump 'ignored early warnings about the threat,' then why did Media & Dems viciously criticize me when I instituted a Travel Ban on China?" he wrote. "They said 'early & not necessary.' Corrupt Media!"He cited a businessman in saying that "Congress was too distracted by the (phony) Impeachment Witch Hunt when they should have been investigating CoronaVirus when it first appeared in China." He blamed states for not being ready. "Governors, get your states testing programs & apparatus perfected," he wrote. "Be ready, big things are happening. No excuses!"He retweeted a message saying that the World Health Organization "enabled China's obfuscation on coronavirus, and that it could have been containable had
Beijing not lied to the world." He also retweeted a post from a friendly conservative television outlet saying that the "Obama admin. repeatedly cut PPE stockpile," referring to personal protective equipment, and "failed to replenish" it.The president seemed particularly upset about a
New York Times article documenting the administration's slow response to the virus. "The @nytimes story is a Fake, just like the 'paper' itself," he wrote Sunday night, denying that Azar warned him "until later" and dismissing an early memo by another adviser, Peter Navarro, who warned of the prospect of 500,000 deaths. "Fake News!"He did not explain why, if he thought the stockpile was inadequate, he did nothing in his three years in office to replenish it. And in none of his messages did he say why he waited to recommend social distancing measures that experts have credited with helping to stem the spread of the virus.This article originally appeared in The New York Times.(C) 2020 The New York Times Company