January 25, 2020

The Unspoken Charge That Should Doom Trump: Lawlessness
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- For three days, the House managers serving as prosecutors in the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump set out the details of his effort to strong-arm Ukraine into aiding his 2020 re-election, and then argued that those details constitute reason to remove him from office. They made a strong case. Using the power of the presidency to push a foreign power to smear a political opponent is an abuse of that power, a “high crime and misdemeanor” in the constitutional phrase setting forth the standard for removal.What of the case made by law professor Josh Blackman in the New York Times on Thursday: that presidents often pursue policies in hopes of improving their political prospects? It is true, of course, that presidents consider domestic politics, including electoral politics, in everything they do. There’s nothing wrong with that. Presidents should act to increase their influence, and that includes taking actions with their professional reputation and personal popularity in mind. So what’s different about Ukraine? For one thing, as Representative Adam Schiff and the other House managers explained, Trump’s actions weren’t taken with politics as one consideration. They were taken, as Schiff said, with electoral concerns as the primary goal.But that’s not enough to make it impeachable. Trump ordered a hold on congressionally approved military aid to Ukraine last summer, according to high-ranking officials who testified in the House impeachment investigation, as the president and his allies were ratcheting up the pressure on the Ukrainian government to announce a criminal investigation of a leading Democratic presidential candidate, former Vice President Joe Biden, along with another investigation into a bizarre, evidence-free theory about Ukraine and the 2016 election.The aid freeze wasn’t part of a legitimate reconsideration of U.S. policy towards Ukraine, which Trump would have been free to initiate. Instead, it was an effort to undermine the consensus plan to support Ukraine as he squeezed that country’s government to help him get re-elected. The president certainly has the right to change his policies and to work to get the rest of the government to go along. It’s much less legitimate to attempt to subvert the official policy. And given that it appears the freeze on aid to Ukraine was illegal, Trump’s scheme wasn’t legitimate at all.Blackman’s analysis is also wrong because it matters how a president uses policy for political advantage. Trump is accused of soliciting foreign election interference! Unlike maneuvering to get a Supreme Court justice to resign, or even deploying troops, Trump tried to get a foreign nation to influence an election. That’s not just a likely violation of U.S. law; it’s contrary to his oath to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”So: Could a president legitimately base Cuba policy in part to win the support of a key group of voters in a swing state? Absolutely. Even if national security experts think the resulting policy would be a bad one. But could a president base Ukraine policy on whether or not the Ukrainian government gets involved in U.S. domestic politics? No. Because that involves something which is itself both illegal and a violation of the president’s oath of office. It is, indeed, an abuse of power — the use of his formal powers to do something illegal and unconstitutional. The truth is, however, that for all of the strength of the House managers’ case, what really clinches it is something they didn’t say, and which isn’t part of the two articles of impeachment that the Senate is considering: Trump’s overall lawlessness. The articles make only a glancing mention of Trump’s obstruction of justice, as laid out in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report on Russian interference in the 2016 election. They don’t say that Trump is probably violating the Constitution’s emoluments clauses when foreign and domestic governments spend money at his hotels and resorts. They say nothing about his threats against the media or his threats to prosecute political opponents. If impeachment was purely a legal matter, those things would therefore be irrelevant and jurors would be directed to ignore them.Impeachment isn’t a judicial procedure. U.S. senators are not mere jurors. Impeachment and removal or acquittal is a political act, even when expressed in judicial language. I don’t mean “political” here only in terms of elections and ordinary partisanship, although those are necessarily part of it, but as the broader idea of politics as the way a polity collectively governs itself. As political scientist Julia Azari has written: “There is no nonpartisan, apolitical mechanism to evaluate abuses of power and remove a president from office. Our Constitution places this responsibility with the people’s elected representatives (and senators, to be precise).” And that’s because the framers thought that politics at its best was very much a good thing — that neither elites who were not ultimately responsible to the people nor any kind of automatic formula was as good as purposeful self-government. Therefore, it is appropriate that members of the House take into account what they know about the president’s fitness for office and his compliance with his oath of office when deciding whether to impeach or not. Senators can — and should — take all of that into account when deciding whether to vote to remove or acquit.To be clear: That doesn’t mean that senators should vote based on whether they like the president or not. Nor should they vote to remove him based on ordinary policy differences, such as disagreements over taxation or abortion or gun control, or to leave him in office because they agree with his positions on such things. They should, indeed, resist their natural urge to vote based on their strongly held policy ideas.If impeachment and conviction should not rest only on the specific articles, why bother having any specific articles of impeachment at all? One reason is that it’s traditional to do so, although note that in the case of the first presidential impeachment trial, of Andrew Johnson in 1868, the House impeached first and drew up the articles later. But it’s a good idea anyway, because it grounds the debate in specific actions. And the need for concrete articles based on particular episodes is a healthy practice in that it probably deters the House majority from simply impeaching presidents they don’t like or have merely ordinary differences with. Just as it is probably healthy that impeachment in practice has become a political procedure expressed in judicial language, by custom if not by constitutional mandate. That, too, deters removing the president merely for policy or partisan differences.And so while Democrats did talk on the Senate floor about Trump’s threat to American democracy given his invitation to other nations to interfere with U.S. elections, they did not talk about Trump’s general lawlessness. The closest Democrats have gotten to that larger idea is to point out that Trump’s various public statements amount to claims that he will repeat this particular offense again — that he asked Russia for help during the 2016 campaign, pressured Ukraine for help in 2019, and publicly asked China for help when the Ukraine scheme went public.But all the senators know that there is more to it than even that — that the president has repeatedly displayed his willingness to flout the law in a variety of serious ways. And they’re entitled to take that knowledge of his unfitness for office into account when deciding what to do about the two accusations before them.To contact the author of this story: Jonathan Bernstein at jbernstein62@bloomberg.netTo contact the editor responsible for this story: Jonathan Landman at jlandman4@bloomberg.netThis column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Bloomberg LP and its owners.Jonathan Bernstein is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering politics and policy. He taught political science at the University of Texas at San Antonio and DePauw University and wrote A Plain Blog About Politics.For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com/opinionSubscribe now to stay ahead with the most trusted business news source.©2020 Bloomberg L.P.
Related Stories
Latest News
Top news around the world
Coronavirus Disease

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by a newly discovered coronavirus.

Most people infected with the COVID-19 virus will experience mild to moderate respiratory illness and recover without requiring special treatment. Older people, and those with underlying medical problems like cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic respiratory disease, and cancer are more likely to develop serious illness.

Around the World

Celebrity News

> Latest News in Media

Watch It
Joel Courtney and Mia Scholink Tie the Knot | E! News
September 30, 2020
FJrqs4Xt7FI
Paris Hilton's Heartfelt Letter to Boyfriend Carter Reum | E! News
September 30, 2020
NSYx_tq7P84
Jennifer Lopez to Receive 2020 People's Icon Award | E! News
September 30, 2020
hvYvNYZjN7g
Dr. Pimple Popper wants you to do this to prevent 'maskne' | Page Six Celebrity News
September 30, 2020
ayS9LURlPy8
Ryan Dorsey blasts ‘absurd’ relationship allegations with ex Naya Rivera’s sister | Page Six News
September 30, 2020
7eywrOtZmEo
Sofia Vergara thought Joe Manganiello would be 'a lot of work' | Hooked Up to Hitched | Page Six
September 29, 2020
TI4XsntN01M
Comedian Brad Williams Considers New Drug for Dwarfism for His Daughter | TMZ
October 01, 2020
murme2fSnuY
Rep. Dwight Evans Says Trump Lost Pennsylvania with Philly 'Bad Things' Diss | TMZ
September 30, 2020
cPd0igHE-G0
Al Sharpton Fears Voter Intimidation After Trump's 'Proud Boys' Message | TMZ
September 30, 2020
VeGaKEFMyk4
BTS: Inside Their Variety Cover Shoot
September 30, 2020
gHo5v0Zko0c
'Julie and the Phantoms' Stars Cheyenne Jackson and Booboo Stewart on LGBTQ Representation
September 23, 2020
AmgkvK3xcJ4
John Cusack Says He Was Never Going to Play 'Breaking Bad's' Walter White
September 24, 2020
t8dtgMU4whA
TV Schedule
Late Night Show
Watch the latest shows of U.S. top comedians

Sports

Latest sport results, news, videos, interviews and comments
Latest Events
01
Oct
KAZAKHSTAN: Premier League
Astana - Kaspyi
01
Oct
AUSTRALIA: NPL South Australia
Adelaide Blue Eagles - Cumberland United
30
Sep
ENGLAND: League Cup
Burnley - Manchester City
30
Sep
ENGLAND: League Cup
Brighton - Manchester United
30
Sep
SPAIN: La Liga
Real Madrid - Real Valladolid
30
Sep
SPAIN: La Liga
Huesca - Atletico Madrid
30
Sep
ITALY: Serie A
Benevento - Inter Milan
30
Sep
ENGLAND: League Cup
Everton - West Ham United
30
Sep
MEXICO: Liga de Ascenso, Apertura
Morelia - Dorados
30
Sep
MEXICO: Liga de Ascenso, Apertura
Pumas Tabasco - Atlante
30
Sep
USA: USL Championship
San Diego Loyal - Phoenix Rising
30
Sep
BRASIL: Serie A
Corinthians - Atletico GO
30
Sep
BRASIL: Serie A
Botafogo - Bahia
30
Sep
MEXICO: Apertura
Tijuana - Juarez
30
Sep
PERU: Primera Division, Apertura
Carlos Manucci - Sporting Cristal
30
Sep
ENGLAND: EFL Trophy
Charlton Athletic - Brighton U-21
30
Sep
BRASIL: Serie B
Cruzeiro - Ponte Preta
30
Sep
MEXICO: Liga de Ascenso, Apertura
Tapatio - Tepatitlan
30
Sep
ENGLAND: League Cup
Newport - Newcastle United
30
Sep
UKRAINE: National Cup
Prykarpattya - Kolos Kovalivka
30
Sep
BRASIL: Serie B
Confianca - Brasil de Pelotas
30
Sep
PERU: Primera Division, Apertura
Dep. Municipal - Universitario
30
Sep
SLOVENIA: 1. SNL
Olimpija - Gorica
30
Sep
SPAIN: La Liga
Eibar - Elche
30
Sep
ITALY: Serie A
Lazio - Atalanta
30
Sep
ASIAN CHAMPIONS LEAGUE: 1/4 finals
Persepolis - Pakhtakor
30
Sep
SPAIN: La Liga
Villarreal - Alaves
30
Sep
ITALY: Serie A
Udinese - Spezia
30
Sep
ESTONIA: Meistriliiga
Nomme Kalju - Tulevik Viljandi
30
Sep
ASIAN CHAMPIONS LEAGUE: 1/4 finals
Al Nasr Riyadh - Al Ahli Jeddah
30
Sep
POLAND: I Liga
Korona - Nieciecza
30
Sep
UKRAINE: National Cup
Oleksandria - Inhulets
30
Sep
UKRAINE: National Cup
Desna - Rukh Lviv
30
Sep
UKRAINE: National Cup
Vorskla - Lviv
30
Sep
UKRAINE: National Cup
Epitsentr Dunayivtsi - Ahrobiznes Volochysk
30
Sep
UKRAINE: National Cup
Kryvbas - Niva V
29
Sep
ENGLAND: League Cup
Tottenham Hotspur - Chelsea
28
Sep
ENGLAND: Premier League
Liverpool - Arsenal
27
Sep
ITALY: Serie A
Roma - Juventus
27
Sep
FRANCE: Ligue 1
Reims - PSG
27
Sep
SPAIN: La Liga
Barcelona - Villarreal
27
Sep
ENGLAND: Premier League
Tottenham Hotspur - Newcastle United
27
Sep
ENGLAND: Premier League
Manchester City - Leicester City
27
Sep
ITALY: Serie A
Crotone - AC Milan
27
Sep
ITALY: Serie A
Napoli - Genoa
27
Sep
SPAIN: La Liga
Atletico Madrid - Granada CF
26
Sep
ITALY: Serie A
Inter Milan - Fiorentina
26
Sep
ENGLAND: Premier League
Brighton - Manchester United
26
Sep
SPAIN: La Liga
Real Betis - Real Madrid
26
Sep
ENGLAND: Premier League
West Bromwich Albion - Chelsea
24
Sep
EUROPA LEAGUE: Third qualifying round
Shkendija - Tottenham Hotspur
24
Sep
ENGLAND: League Cup
Manchester City - Bournemouth
24
Sep
ENGLAND: League Cup
Lincoln City - Liverpool
24
Sep
EUROPA LEAGUE: Third qualifying round
AC Milan - Bodo-Glimt
23
Sep
ENGLAND: League Cup
Leicester City - Arsenal
23
Sep
ENGLAND: League Cup
Chelsea - Barnsley
22
Sep
ENGLAND: League Cup
Luton - Manchester United
21
Sep
ENGLAND: Premier League
Wolves - Manchester City
21
Sep
ITALY: Serie A
AC Milan - Bologna
20
Sep
SPAIN: La Liga
Real Sociedad - Real Madrid
Find us on Instagram
at @feedimo to stay up to date with the latest.
Featured Video You Might Like
L1eLanNeZKg i1XRgbyUtOo -g9Qziqbif8 0vmRhiLHE2U JFCZUoa6MYE UfN5PCF5EUo 2PV55f3-UAg W3y9zuI_F64 -7qCxIccihU pQ9gcOoH9R8 g5MRDEXRk4k tudKp5Vhs3k
Copyright © 2020 Feedimo. All Rights Reserved.