The
UK needs to learn from the term “Islamo-leftism” to address the alliance between radical Islamists and the far left-wing, a designation openly used in France, a geopolitical expert has said. Since aligning with the Palestinian cause in October 7, far left-wing groups in the UK have shown support for actions by groups like Hamas, leading to significant
protests across England, raising fears that radical Islamists are finding common ground with communist ideologies. Alexandre del Valle, a French/Italian professor of geopolitics and international relations at IPAG Business School told The Epoch Times that France’s freedom to discuss Islam allows for the use of such terms. Furthermore, he said that
France has a strong tradition of secularism, which despite the country suffering from more deadly Islamist attacks, enables discussions with prominent figures openly condemning Islamo-leftism, citing its disruptive influence in universities and its potential links to terrorism. “In Anglo-Saxon countries, there has been a tolerance for Islamism,” he said. He also said there is a disparity in freedom of expression regarding depictions of the Prophet Muhammad, noting that such portrayals are restricted in the UK but widely seen in France. “You can’t show the Prophet Muhammad on large
British TV channels. But in France, everyone saw it after Charlie Hebdo,” he said, of the attack on the French satirical weekly magazine by Islamists in 2015. “The only reason we can talk about Islamo-leftism is because we are a laic country,” he said “We have moderate left, an anti-authoritarian left,” he added. “In France, even the politically correct left and the socialist anti-Trotsky left denounces the Islamist leftist alliance,” he added. Mr. Del Valle said he once met an MI6 agent in 1998 as a French civil servant working on radicalisation. He asked him why the UK has so many Islamists, why it had given shelter to terrorists that had committed acts in France and why
England wouldn’t extradite them. He said that the MI6 agent replied (“he was very proud to say it”) because we can keep a “close eye on them, we know why they are doing it, and that’s why we don’t have terrorist attacks.” He said that a good image of tolerating Islam was important to relations and the state didn’t want to be seen as “Islamophobic.” However, this was before the UK’s first Islamist suicide attack, the 7/7 central
London bombings in 2005. “Now the politicians, now they understand there is a change,” he said, but he added that there is a “huge Islamist power in London. It’s not just the left, it’s the Capital.” Mr. Del Valle said that while Islamist terrorism remains a significant threat in Western Europe, the UK is influenced by a “powerful Muslim lobby,” particularly due to investments in infrastructure, universities and more from Middle Eastern monarchies like
Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, and
Egypt. He added that in the UK, the issue now is that mass migration has “privileged Commonwealth countries, notably with Muslims from
Pakistan and India” after
Brexit, as opposed to European, so issues connected to Islamism is likely to continue. “Incorporating a particularly confrontational form of community-based identity politics, it remains as Islamist at its core as it is post-modern and post-colonial in its outer trappings,” he said. He noted the “remarkable” way in which “critical-theory-infused claims” have found their way into documents such as the 2018 report by the All Party Parliamentary Group on British Muslims on the definition of Islamophobia. That report spoke of the “intersectional nature of Islamophobia,“ “gendered Islamophobia,” “micro-aggressions,” “lived experience,” the existence of a “binary narrative” about Muslims in the media, the “problematisation” of “Muslimness,” and the “racialisation” and “othering” involved in representations of Islam. Anti-Israel
protesters have also been observed at the events, organised by the activist organisation Palestine Solidarity Campaign, cheering for Hamas and the Yemeni Shia Islamist political and
MILITARY organisation Houthis. PSC has links to many trade unions in the UK, including the National Education Union and UNISON. He said that when he tried to criticise this, his comments “sent some of the liberal elite into overdrive.” Mr. Najmi said “that all the socialist elements, all those communist elements, are within Islam.” He believed that Islamism was used a political tool, as an ideology to overcome the prevailing regional ideology. Mr. Najmi said that if Islamist extremists consider that “they are at war with you, then their social contract changes with you completely, because religion allows them to change the social contract.” On why the UK left is seemingly blind to Hamas’ terrorism extremism, he said that the history of Palestine itself its “steeped in Marxism.” For example, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, the second largest group within the Palestine Liberation Organization, is characterised by its secular Palestinian Marxist—Leninist and revolutionary socialist ideology, making it a significant component of the Palestinian national movement. “They see Israel as as a symbol of capitalism,” said Mr. Najmi. “And they see, like anyone, who can destroy them or help them destroy this one big capitalist symbol will mean victory for Marxists. I think that’s at the heart of it. That is why they’re so determined by the ideology,” he added.